ArticleBiology methods & protocols2025
Deep learning-based classification of colorectal cancer in histopathology images for category detection.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based automated detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma in histopathological images: a comparative study of five CNN architectures.Odontology · 2026Article
- Grad-CAM based deep learning analytics for image-level colon disease classification based on graph neural networks and vision transformers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2026
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and timely diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is essential for effective treatment and better patient outcomes. This study explores the application of deep learning (DL) for automated CRC categories classification using hematoxylin and eosin-stained histopathology (H&E) images. Among the models, ResNet-34 demonstrated a strong balance of performance and complexity, achieving an overall accuracy of 85.04%, with top-2 and top-3 classification accuracies of 96.68% and 99.23%, respectively. ResNet-50 exhibited the highest micro-averaged ROC AUC of 0.9933 and F1-score of 87.51%. Swin Transformer V2 model also showed competitive results, with Swin v2-t-w8 achieving particularly high accuracy in Hyperplasia polyp detection (95.83%) and Adenocarcinoma (93.33%), alongside strong ROC AUCs (0.9926 for Hyperplasia polyp and 0.9864 for Adenocarcinoma), though at the cost of increased computational demands. We further developed a two-stage prediction framework comprising a binary abnormal detection stage followed by a multiclass cancer classifier. This approach substantially improved classification robustness, particularly for underrepresented and morphologically complex classes. Particularly, High-grade dysplasia classification accuracy improved from 53.57% with ResNet-34 to 71.43% in its two-stage extension. These results suggest that moderate-depth architectures can effectively capture the morphological diversity of colorectal cancer stages and provide an interpretable, efficient deep learning-based diagnostic tool to support pathologists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.