Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256886›Full record

ArticleArXiv2025

Promoting arm movement practice with a novel wheelchair armrest early after stroke: A randomized controlled trial.

Sangjoon J Kim, Vicky Chan, Niko Fullmer, Emily R Rosario, Christine Kim, Charles Y Liu, Marti Comellas, Daniel K Zondervan, David J Reinkensmeyer, An H Do

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05880940 (Comparing Different Rehabilitation Exercise Strategies for Improving Arm Recovery After Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05880940 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Different Rehabilitation Exercise Strategies for Improving Arm Recovery After Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, IrvineRan2023 to 2025Enrolled35ConditionsStrokeArmsBoost - Moveable Wheelchair Armrest, Electronic Arm and Hand Exercise Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sangjoon J KimBionics Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Vicky ChanDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Niko FullmerCasa Colina Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, CA, USA.
Emily R RosarioCasa Colina Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, CA, USA.
Christine KimRancho Research Institute, Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, USA.
Charles Y LiuCasa Colina Research Institute, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare, Pomona, CA, USA.
Marti ComellasUniversity of Lleida - Polytechnic School, Lleida, Spain.
Daniel K ZondervanFlint Rehabilitation Devices, LCC, Irvine, CA, USA.
David J ReinkensmeyerDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
An H DoDepartment of Neurology, UC Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

Boost: A pragmatic inpatient rehabilitation strategy for improving musculoskeletal arm recovery after strokeR44HD106850 · NICHD · FLINT REHABILITATION DEVICES · PI ZONDERVAN, DANIEL · 2021 to 2022
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R44 HD106850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic upper extremity (UE) impairment is common after stroke. This study evaluated Boost, a novel wheelchair-mounted rehabilitation device designed to assist individuals in UE motor recovery during inpatient rehabilitation. Method: Thirty-five stroke inpatients were randomized to perform additional UE exercises alongside standard therapy, using either Boost or a therapist-customized booklet for self-practice. Outcomes included the UE Fugl-Meyer (UEFM) Exam, Box and Block Test, Motor Activity Log, Modified Ashworth Scale, shoulder subluxation, and shoulder pain. Results: At baseline, mean days post-stroke were 11.9±4.6 and 13.1±5.9, and UEFM scores were 20.5±10.1 and 21.0±13.5. Intervention durations averaged 11.9±4.0 and 17.2±8.8 days, respectively. Participants in the Boost group completed 3,359±3,137 additional arm movements. No significant between-group differences were found at the three-month follow-up. However, the Boost group showed a trend toward greater UEFM improvement immediately post-intervention (11.8 vs. 6.9 points, p=0.06). Importantly, UEFM gains were predicted by the number of Boost exercises performed (p=0.02, R Conclusions: These findings demonstrate the feasibility of achieving thousands of additional UE practice movements while seated in a wheelchair without direct supervision during subacute rehabilitation. The added movement practice was well tolerated and may offer short-term impairment-reduction benefits, particularly in those with less severe impairment. Larger trials are needed to confirm efficacy, establish optimal dosage, and determine long-term clinical and functional benefits of Boost-assisted therapy.This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the title "Comparing Different Rehabilitation Exercise Strategies for Improving Arm Recovery After Stroke (Boost)" in May 2023; registration number: NCT05880940.

Indexed as

randomized clinical trialrehabilitationStrokeunsupervised trainingwheelchair mounted device

Identifiers

PMID41256886
PMCPMC12622192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.