ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Primary biliary cholangitis. Treatment options in 2025. A narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Treatment of Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: A Comprehensive Review.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Clinical and Demographic Features of Primary Biliary Cholangitis in Kazakhstan.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Primary Biliary Cholangitis Pathogenesis: A Pathophysiology-Based Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic, cholestatic disease with a female predominance and a long disease duration. The pathogenesis of PBC is still unclear; however, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, alongside immune dysregulation, seem to lead to a dysfunction of the biliary 'bicarbonate umbrella' and increased biliary epithelial cells apoptosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has been the treatment of choice for PBC since its approval back in 1994; however, a percentage varying from 15-40% of all patients fail to achieve biochemical response or alkaline phosphatase normalization. Obeticholic acid, though promising at first, failed to show benefit after long-term use and was retracted from the market. Two peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists (PPARs) have recently been approved for use in patients with PBC, showing biochemical response in non-responders and improvement of pruritus. However, a substantial percentage of patients fail to achieve serum alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin normalization; as a result, many drugs with different mechanisms of action are in phase 2 or 3 trials. The aim of this review is to present available data regarding PBC treatment and explain the pathogenetic pathway each one targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.