Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256826›Full record

ReviewScientifica2025

Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Systematic Review Based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation.

Varshini R J, Edlin Glane Mathias, R Sai Bhavana, Sanjay P Patil, Rajesh Kamath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scientifica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Varshini R JDepartment of Healthcare and Hospital Management, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Edlin Glane MathiasDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, Prasanna School of Public Health, MAHE, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-3064
R Sai BhavanaDepartment of Healthcare and Hospital Management, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Sanjay P PatilDepartment of Healthcare and Hospital Management, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Rajesh KamathDepartment of Healthcare and Hospital Management, Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7268-9159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is currently considered the gold standard of treatment, with its evidence-based framework widely used in healthcare. However, its implementation in real-world settings faces numerous challenges. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of CBT implementation is essential to improving its accessibility and effectiveness. A systematic search was conducted across multiple databases from 20/9/2024 to 10/10/2024, including PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, and Web of Science. Studies published in English from 1994 to 2024 were included. This systematic review was reported using the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Registered No. CRD42024570477). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies were analyzed to identify key implementation challenges and enablers. Data extraction and quality assessments were performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) and the JBI critical appraisal tools. A total of 32 studies with 2082 participants were included in this review. Common barriers to CBT implementation included limited training opportunities for clinicians, high caseloads, organizational constraints, resistance to change, and inadequate funding. Digital literacy challenges and technical issues further hindered the adoption of internet-based CBT (iCBT). Facilitators included strong leadership support, structured training programs, stakeholder engagement, and the integration of digital and step-care approaches to enhance accessibility. The findings highlight the importance of addressing systemic, organizational, and individual-level barriers to improve the implementation of CBT. Strengthening clinician training, increasing institutional support, and leveraging digital solutions can enhance the accessibility and sustainability of CBT interventions. This review provides practical insights for policymakers, mental health professionals, and researchers working toward optimizing CBT implementation in diverse settings.

Indexed as

cognitive behavioral therapyconsolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR)implementation barriersimplementation facilitatorsmental health interventionssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41256826
PMCPMC12623086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.