ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Situational analysis of antimicrobial resistance policies and program implementation in the Philippines, 2019-2023.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Mapping antimicrobial resistance interventions in ASEAN countries: a scoping review of implementation patterns, One Health integration, and evidence gaps.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is a pressing global threat to public, agricultural, and environmental health. In 2015, the WHO launched the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), emphasizing the importance of a unified One Health approach to involve all sectors in combating AMR. Member states, including the Philippines, were encouraged to develop their own national action plans. This study is an implementation review of its second iteration, the Philippine National Action Plan to Combat AMR 2019-2023 using the One Health Approach, investigating its progress, successes, and challenges. Quantitative data was collected by asking relevant government agencies to rate each activity by its level of progress; results were elucidated and validated with national policies and reports, international benchmarks, insights from key informant interviews, and technical consultations with government agencies and international organizations. Findings revealed notable progress in AMR policy development, regulation, and surveillance in the human and animal health sectors. However, the environmental sector lacks formal engagement, regulatory mandates, and surveillance capacity, limiting a true One Health approach. Other challenges remain in agricultural data collection, laboratory capacity, and interagency coordination at the local levels, where implementation is crucial. Local authorities lack in training, support, and technical expertise on AMR's far-reaching impacts, hindering effective enforcement and response. Recommendations include increased laboratory and staff financing, expanded surveillance infrastructure, and enhanced environmental sector participation. Additionally, integrating socioeconomic and gender considerations into AMR strategies will improve policy responsiveness. While significant milestones have been achieved, sustained commitment, cross-sector collaboration, and strengthened regulatory frameworks are critical to ensuring a more comprehensive and effective response to AMR in the Philippines. This study was funded by the European Union and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.