ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025
The effects of low-level laser therapy in extensor tendon injuries between zones 5 and 8 of the hand: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to examine whether low-level laser therapy (LLLT), when combined with conventional therapy, contributes to the rehabilitation of patients with zone 5 to 8 extensor tendon injuries. Patients and methods: A total of 55 patients (44 males, 11 females; mean age: 34.2±11.3 years; range, 18 to 55 years) with hand extensor tendon injury were included in the double-blind randomized controlled study between April 30, 2020, and December 30, 2020. Controlled active motion protocol was applied to all patients. In addition, LLLT was applied to one group and sham laser to another group for 10 sessions. Patients were evaluated at baseline and four and eight weeks after intervention. Visual Analog Scale for pain, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire for upper extremity symptoms and functions, and nine-hole peg test for hand dexterity were used. The range of motion of the hand and metacarpophalangeal joint circumference were measured. Grip strength was evaluated only at the eighth postoperative week. Results: In both groups, significant improvement was observed in all evaluation parameters, except for wrist range of motion at the eighth postoperative week measurement (p<0.05). When the clinical outcomes were compared between the groups, no significant difference was observed in all clinical parameters both in the fourth and eighth week measurements after intervention (p>0.05). Conclusion: In our study, no additional contribution of LLLT to the rehabilitation of extensor tendon injuries between zones 5 and 8 was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.