ArticlePeerJ2025
Enhancing heatstroke prediction accuracy with interpretable machine learning: a multi-center data-driven approach.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heatstroke poses a significant threat to public health, frequently culminating in fatal outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to forecast heatstroke using clinical and laboratory data. Methods: Data were collated from 24 hospitals spanning the years 2021 to 2023, with data from 2021 and 2022 comprising the training datasets and data from 2023 designated for validation. Model efficacy was quantified Results: The study encompassed 691 patients, with 176 in the training datasets and 80 in the testing datasets diagnosed with heatstroke. Among the nine ML models assessed, the gradient boosting machine (GBM) model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUROC of 0.971 in the training datasets and 0.836 in the testing datasets, and exhibiting substantial net benefits in decision curve analysis. Creatine kinase (CK)-MB was identified as the most impactful variable influencing the GBM model's efficacy. Conclusion: The ML model we developed demonstrates robust predictive capabilities for heatstroke, potentially aiding clinicians in the identification and management of patients at elevated risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.