Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256765›Full record

ArticleASME journal of heat and mass transfer2025

Multifidelity Uncertainty Quantification for Focused Ultrasound Breast Cancer Therapies Using Reduced Order Models.

Jakob G Bates, Christopher R Dillon, Matthew R Jones, John T Tencer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ASME journal of heat and mass transfer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jakob G BatesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, 350 Engineering Building, Provo, UT 84602.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-1640
Christopher R DillonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, 350 Engineering Building, Provo, UT 84602.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1195-0015
Matthew R JonesDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Brigham Young University, 350 Engineering Building, Provo, UT 84602.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-747X
John T TencerThermal Sciences and Engineering, Sandia National Laboratories, 1515 Eubank SE, Albuquerque, NM 87123.

Funding

TRD - VisualizationP41GM103545 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2012 to 2019
$9.7M
Validation and translation of a non-invasive, MR-guided breast cancer therapyR37CA224141 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PAYNE, ALLISON · 2018 to 2024
$3.7M
Center for Integrative Biomedical Computing Legacy TransitionR24GM136986 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER R., MACLEOD, ROB S. · 2020 to 2022
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R37 CA224141NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103545NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM136986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) is a thermal therapy used to noninvasively destroy diseased tissues. Computational tools are being explored to plan faster, safer, and more effective focused ultrasound treatments by using simulations to predict their outcomes. For simulations to be used with confidence, the uncertainties in their predicted outcomes must be characterized. This is challenging because the simulations have a large computational cost and performing uncertainty quantification (UQ) typically requires evaluating the simulations many times. Multifidelity uncertainty quantification uses techniques that aim to reduce the computational cost of uncertainty quantification. This is done by combining results from computationally expensive and accurate high-fidelity models with lower-fidelity models that sacrifice some accuracy to reduce computational expense. In this work, a multifidelity uncertainty quantification technique using projection-based reduced order models (ROMs) as the low-fidelity model is used on thermal simulations of two focused ultrasound sonications performed as part of breast cancer treatments. The errors in mean response estimates of multiple quantities of interest (QoIs) using this multifidelity uncertainty quantification technique are compared against those using traditional Monte Carlo uncertainty quantification. The mean, standard deviation, and skewness estimated using the multifidelity and Monte Carlo techniques are fit to Pearson Type III distributions to compare their predictions of quantity of interest distributions. It is found that multifidelity uncertainty quantification predicts the mean response of the quantities of interest with up to 50% lower error while maintaining similar accuracy in distribution predictions when compared to Monte Carlo.

Identifiers

PMID41256765
PMCPMC12621354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.