ArticleTransplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation2025
Duodenoduodenostomy as an Attractive Option for Exocrine Drainage in Pancreas Transplantation: Insights From a Single-Center Cohort.
Article in Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Nurturing a Sustainable Transplantation Journey: the best of ESOT Congress 2025.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Techniques such as retroperitoneal graft placement have further enhanced the ability to replicate the physiology of the "native" pancreas. In our center, from January 2000, duodenojejunostomy (DJ) was the standard technique for exocrine drainage (n = 337). Herein, we report a series of 188 pancreas transplantations performed between May 2016 to July 2025, using a fully retrocolic graft position, systemic venous drainage and enteric drainage via duodenoduodenostomy. The primary endpoint was the assessment of intestinal events and their impact on graft and patient survival. A total of 14 patients (7.4%) experienced complications, including paralytic ileus (n = 2), intestinal obstruction (n = 4), duodenal dehiscence following pancreas transplantectomy (n = 1), anastomotic dehiscence (n = 5), and anastomotic bleeding (n = 2). Of these, 11 cases required relaparotomy for adhesiolysis (n = 2), internal hernia repair (n = 1), Hartmann's procedure (n = 1), transplantectomy (n = 2), primary leak closure (n = 3), and hemostasis with duodenal re-anastomosis (n = 2). After a median follow-up of 42.8 months [IQR 21.8-71.1], graft survival at 1 and 5 years was 87% and 83.4%, respectively (P = 0.688 vs. DJ group), while patient survival was 100% and 98.2% (P = 0.031 vs. DJ group). Duodenoduodenostomy proved to be a feasible and effective technique, offering competitive outcomes in terms of graft and patient survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.