ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Few-Shot Classification of Cryo-EM Micrographs Using Triplet Loss Embeddings.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Micrograph quality assessment in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) presents a significant challenge: users must either manually screen thousands of micrographs or expend substantial computational resources processing potentially low-quality data. While few-shot learning has been applied to particle picking and subtomogram classification in cryo-EM, its application to micrograph-level quality assessment remains largely unexplored. We present a framework combining few-shot learning with cryo-EM micrograph classification using triplet loss embeddings. By combining real-space and Fourier-space information in an embedding network trained with triplet loss, we achieve competitive performance across multiple EMPIAR datasets using as few as 1-5 labeled examples per class. Our approach demonstrates improvements over traditional cross-entropy training, which often collapses to predicting only the majority class in the few-shot regime. These results suggest a practical framework for rapid adaptation of automated micrograph screening to new experimental conditions with minimal manual labeling.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.