Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256668›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

RNA sequence design and protein-DNA specificity prediction with NA-MPNN.

Andrew Kubaney, Andrew Favor, Lilian McHugh, Raktim Mitra, Robert Pecoraro, Justas Dauparas, Cameron Glasscock, David Baker

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrew KubaneyInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-4982-6050
Andrew FavorInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9977-2785
Lilian McHughInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0291-2196
Raktim MitraInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1182-3742
Robert PecoraroInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1656-0470
Justas DauparasInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0030-144X
Cameron GlasscockInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-6339
David BakerInstitute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7896-6217

Funding

Project 5: mRNA and mRNA-launched nanoparticle vaccinesU19AI181881 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KING, NEIL, STUART, LYNDA · 2024 to 2024
$41.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI181881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA sequence design and protein-DNA binding specificity prediction can both be framed as nucleic acid inverse-folding problems: finding the most likely nucleic acid sequences given a fixed three-dimensional structure of a nucleic acid or nucleic acid-protein complex. While task-specific tools have been developed, no unified deep learning model for nucleic acid inverse folding has been described; a single model would have larger and more diverse datasets available for training and a considerably greater range of applicability. Here we introduce Nucleic Acid MPNN (NA-MPNN), a message-passing neural network that treats proteins, DNA, and RNA within a unified biopolymer graph representation. NA-MPNN outperforms previous methods on RNA sequence design and fixed-dock protein-DNA specificity prediction, and should be broadly useful for

Identifiers

PMID41256668
PMCPMC12621952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.