ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Magnetically Controlled Microrobots for In Vivo Non-Invasive Embryo Transfer.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Infertility affects millions worldwide and is often linked to factors such as poor sperm quality and female reproductive organ disorders. Despite significant advancements in in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), implantation rates remain low, ranging from 17 to 21% after three days of incubation, mainly due to stress, lifestyle factors, and uterine conditions. Extended embryo culture techniques have shown promise in improving pregnancy rates. However, the availability of high-quality blastocysts remains a major challenge. Intrafallopian transfer techniques, such as gamete/zygote intrafallopian transfer (GIFT/ZIFT), were introduced to improve fertilization and early embryo development, particularly for patients with repeated embryo implantation failure (10-30% of assisted reproduction technology (ART) cases, particularly in women >35). However, these methods have declined due to advancements in IVF and the variability in laparoscopy procedures used for GIFT/ZIFT. To address these challenges, we propose a non-invasive microrobotic embryo transfer (μET) technique using remotely controlled microcarriers comparable in size to embryos. We demonstrate the capabilities of magnetically actuated spiral microrobots, fabricated using laser direct writing for capturing, transporting, and releasing embryos into murine uteri. Additionally, we characterize their motion performance and implement image-guided closed-loop control and dual ultrasound (US)/photoacoustic (PA) tracking for deep-tissue interventions. Recognizing the importance of clinical translation, we present preliminary studies on gelatin-based microrobots, a biodegradable alternative, and explore endometrial remodeling after the in vivo transfer of microrobots carrying embryo-like structures. Our findings show that these microrobots can effectively transport embryos, support their development, and enable minimally invasive delivery, providing a more natural, targeted, and non-invasive strategy for in vivo assisted reproduction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.