Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256452›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Determination of Drug Sensitivity in Patient Derived Models of Breast Cancer by Multiparametric QPI.

Edward R Polanco, Tarek E Moustafa, Ozlen Balcioglu, Sandra D Scherer, Emilio Cortes-Sanchez, Sophie Remick, Benjamin T Spike, Alana L Welm, Bryan E Welm, Philip S Bernard and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Edward R PolancoDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0001-7388-962X
Tarek E MoustafaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0001-5282-8246
Ozlen BalciogluHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Sandra D SchererHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-7943-8595
Emilio Cortes-SanchezHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Sophie RemickDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Benjamin T SpikeHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-0893-3302
Alana L WelmHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-1412-1351
Bryan E WelmHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0002-1879-6612
Philip S BernardHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Thomas A ZangleDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.ORCID 0000-0001-5899-3517

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Tolinapant efficacy in a subset of triple negative breast cancersU54CA224076 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Alana L. Welm · 2017 to 2026
$13.5M
The Center for Label-free Imagingand Multiscale Biophotonics (CLIMB)P41EB031772 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Stephen A Boppart · 2022 to 2026
$7.6M
Longitudinal models of breast cancer for studying mechanisms of therapy response and resistanceU01CA217617 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MARTH, GABOR T, VARLEY, KATHERINE ELENA · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS U01 CA217617NCI NIH HHS U54 CA224076NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional precision oncology seeks to match patients with effective therapies by empirically testing patient-derived samples for drug sensitivity in the laboratory. However, existing approaches require significant sample expansion time and expense prior to analysis, rendering them impractical for routine clinical testing. Quantitative phase imaging (QPI) provides a potential path forward by directly measuring responses at single cell resolution without the need for extensive sample expansion. In previous work, we demonstrated that multiple, independent parameters of cellular response to therapeutic agents can be derived from QPI data, an approach we call multiparametric QPI (mQPI). Here, we demonstrate application of mQPI using cells from patient derived xenograft organoid (PDxO) models, as well as cells viably frozen direct from patients. Using mQPI with breast cancer PDxO models, we uncover distinct drug responses for cells originating from different anatomic sites in the same patient and resolve cellular heterogeneity of response in a model of acquired therapeutic resistance. We also show that mQPI can detect drug responses in viably frozen primary patient samples, either direct from thaw or after a short term expansion of only 2 weeks. Overall, these data provide proof-of-principle for application of mQPI to a range of sample types, including cryopreserved material direct from patients. This underscores the clinical potential of mQPI as a time- and materials-efficient alternative to current methods in functional precision oncology.

Identifiers

PMID41256452
PMCPMC12621830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.