Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256441›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Edit Distance Embedding with Genomic Large Language Model.

Xiang Li, Ke Chen, Yijia Zhang, Mingfu Shao

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiang LiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University.
Ke ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University.ORCID 0000-0001-5470-6621
Yijia ZhangSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University.
Mingfu ShaoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University.

Funding

Computational Methods for Assembling Multiple RNA-seq SamplesR01HG011065 · NHGRI · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI SHAO, MINGFU · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edit distance is a fundamental metric in genomic sequence analysis, yet it is computationally expensive to calculate. A practical approach for large-scale sequence analysis involves mapping sequences into a normed space and approximating the edit distance using the more efficiently computed distance in that space. This process, known as edit distance embedding, has been extensively studied both theoretically and in practice. Recently, embedding methods based on machine learning have gained popularity, where the mapping is represented as a neural network whose parameters are learned from data. However, the accuracy of these methods remains unsatisfactory, leaving much room for improvement. Recent advancements in genomic language models have shown remarkable performance in various sequence analysis applications. We investigate if improved embeddings can be achieved using DNA language models. We introduce LLMED, a model designed to produce sequence embeddings approximating the edit distance. LLMED is trained via contrastive learning based on a pretrained genomic large language model. Through extensive experimental comparisons, we show that LLMED surpasses leading machine learning and rule-based embedding methods in approximating the edit distance; LLMED also achieved significantly improved accuracy in a critical application, similar sequence search.

Identifiers

PMID41256441
PMCPMC12621852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.