ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Edit Distance Embedding with Genomic Large Language Model.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Edit distance is a fundamental metric in genomic sequence analysis, yet it is computationally expensive to calculate. A practical approach for large-scale sequence analysis involves mapping sequences into a normed space and approximating the edit distance using the more efficiently computed distance in that space. This process, known as edit distance embedding, has been extensively studied both theoretically and in practice. Recently, embedding methods based on machine learning have gained popularity, where the mapping is represented as a neural network whose parameters are learned from data. However, the accuracy of these methods remains unsatisfactory, leaving much room for improvement. Recent advancements in genomic language models have shown remarkable performance in various sequence analysis applications. We investigate if improved embeddings can be achieved using DNA language models. We introduce LLMED, a model designed to produce sequence embeddings approximating the edit distance. LLMED is trained via contrastive learning based on a pretrained genomic large language model. Through extensive experimental comparisons, we show that LLMED surpasses leading machine learning and rule-based embedding methods in approximating the edit distance; LLMED also achieved significantly improved accuracy in a critical application, similar sequence search.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.