Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256401›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Uniform processing and analysis of IGVF massively parallel reporter assay data with MPRAsnakeflow.

Jonathan D Rosen, Arjun Devadas Vasanthakumari, Kilian Salomon, Nikola de Lange, Pyaree Mohan Dash, Pia Keukeleire, Ali Hassan, Alejandro Barrera, Martin Kircher, Michael I Love and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan D RosenDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6396-4219
Arjun Devadas VasanthakumariInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3090-1200
Kilian SalomonBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-3182-7987
Nikola de LangeInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8395-9369
Pyaree Mohan DashBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1005-0437
Pia KeukeleireInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8828-636X
Ali HassanInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-2852-092X
Alejandro BarreraDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical School, Durham, NC, USA.
Martin KircherInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9278-5471
Michael I LoveDepartment of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8401-0545
Max SchubachBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2032-6679

Funding

Systematic in vivo characterization of disease-associated regulatory variantsUM1HG012003 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michael Isaiah Love, KAREN L. MOHLKE · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
Massively parallel characterization of variants and elements impacting transcriptional regulation in dynamic cellular systemsUM1HG011966 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Nadav Ahituv, Jay Ashok Shendure · 2021 to 2026
$9.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG011966NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG012003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As researchers and clinicians seek to identify human genomic alterations relevant to traits and disorders, identifying and aggregating evidence providing mechanistic support for associations between alterations and phenotypes remains challenging. In particular, the study of non-coding genomic variation remains a major challenge due to the lack of accurate functional annotation for activity in a given context and across alleles. Experimental evidence is critical for prioritizing and interpreting functional effects of genetic alterations. Massively Parallel Reporter Assays (MPRAs) have emerged as a powerful high-throughput approach, enabling quantification of regulatory element activity and allelic effects, and systematic dissection of gene regulatory logic and variant effects across different contexts. However, the diversity of MPRA designs, lack of standardized formats, and many potential processing parameters hamper data integration, reproducibility, and meta-analyses across studies. To address these challenges, the Impact of Genomic Variation on Function (IGVF) Consortium established an MPRA focus group to develop community standards, including harmonized file formats, and robust analysis pipelines for a wide range of library types and experimental designs. Here, we present these formats and comprehensive computational tools, MPRAlib and MPRAsnakeflow, for uniform processing from raw sequencing reads to counts, processing and visualization. Using diverse MPRA datasets, we characterize technical variability sources including barcode sequence bias, outlier barcodes, and delivery method (episomal vs. lentiviral). Our results establish best practices for MPRA data generation and analysis, facilitating robust, reproducible research and large-scale integration. The presented tools and standards are publicly available, providing a foundation for future collaborative efforts in regulatory genomics.

Identifiers

PMID41256401
PMCPMC12621732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.