Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256370›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Working memory expands shared task representations in cortex.

E Mika Diamanti, Lucas Pinto, Manuel Schottdorf, Abigail A Russo, Stephan Y Thiberge, Carlos D Brody, David W Tank

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E Mika DiamantiPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1199-3362
Lucas PintoDepartment of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago IL 60611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0471-9317
Manuel SchottdorfPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5468-4255
Abigail A RussoPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Stephan Y ThibergeBezos Center for Neural Dynamics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6583-6613
Carlos D BrodyPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4201-561X
David W TankPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9423-4267

Funding

P5: Mechanistic Multi-Region Brain ModelsU19NS132720 · NINDS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Samuel Sheng-Hung Wang · 2023 to 2026
$21.5M
Mechanisms underlying large-scale coordination of cortical activity during perceptual decisionsK99MH120047 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI PINTO, LUCAS · 2019 to 2020
$217k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH120047NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS132720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognition is thought to emerge from the flexible organization of neural activity, yet how this organization reconfigures across behaviors varying in cognitive load remains unclear. We investigated how the structure of working-memory representations in the cortex compares to task representations that do not involve working memory. We used a task-switching paradigm in virtual reality, where mice alternated between a navigation-based working-memory task and a simpler task with matched sensorimotor demands. During behavior, we simultaneously imaged three cortical areas: higher visual area AM, and two association areas-premotor (M2) and retrosplenial cortex. At the single-neuron level, trial-averaged activity appeared similar across tasks. However, pairwise correlations decreased during the working-memory task, particularly in association areas. In addition, the corresponding linear task subspace explained the variance of both tasks equally well, whereas the simpler task subspace failed to do so, suggesting an asymmetric relationship between them. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction revealed a shared low-dimensional structure across tasks. Yet, the organization of neuronal firing fields along this shared structure accounted for the difference in pairwise correlations: in the working-memory task, firing fields were more disjoint, especially among neurons in association areas that formed sequences along the memory dimension. Moreover, the degree of overlap between these firing fields predicted the mice's behavioral reliance on working memory. We conclude that behaviors varying in cognitive demands are supported by a single low-dimensional neural structure, which can expand or contract depending on cognitive load. We thus provide a framework for how task representations across the cortex reconfigure to support cognitive processes.

Identifiers

PMID41256370
PMCPMC12621725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.