ArticleJAAD international2026
Predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in melanoma patients: A machine learning-based predictive model.
Article in JAAD international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Risk factors for sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in melanoma have been studied. However, there remains a lack of widely applicable models with considerable predictive potential for clinical use. Objective: To developed a well-performing machine learning-based model for predicting SLN metastasis in melanoma patients. Methods: This study collected data on 351 melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy from our center. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used for recognizing key features. The optimal model was selected from 10 machine learning algorithms based on the F1 score. SHapley Additive exPlanations was employed to interpret the outcome of the predictive model. R package Shiny was used to develop a web tool. Results: The neural network model was chosen with the highest F1-score (0.73), indicating considerable predictive accuracy and calibration. SHapley Additive exPlanations results indicate the related factors for SLN metastasis in melanoma patients were Breslow thickness, microsatellites, Ki67 index, and subtype. Ultimately, we developed a web-based tool to promote the clinical application of the model. Limitations: Retrospective study, single institution. Conclusions: This study established a robust and interpretable machine learning approach for melanoma SLN metastasis prediction. With high sensitivity and accuracy, this approach could reduce misdiagnosis rates and alleviate patient suffering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.