Intramedullary Nailing vs Plate Fixation of the Fibula in the Setting of Distal Tibial Fractures Requiring ORIF: National Readmissions Database Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Background: Most cases of tibia and fibula shaft fractures are treated without fixation of the fibula. However, there are some cases where fibula fixation is thought to improve patient outcome. The fibula can be stabilized by surface plating or medullary nailing but literature comparing these 2 fixation techniques is limited. This study evaluates postoperative complications and readmission rates between intramedullary (IM) nailing and surface plating of fibular fractures in patients undergoing concomitant tibial osteosynthesis. Methods: Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2021, we identified patients undergoing tibial open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal tibial fractures with concurrent fibular fixation using either IM nailing or plate fixation were identified. Propensity score matching was performed to balance demographic and clinical covariates. The prespecified primary endpoint was overall 90-day wound/infectious complications; secondary outcomes included specific complications and 30- and 90-day readmissions. Results: After matching, 3497 IM nailing cases and 3381 plating cases were included. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. IM fixation was associated with significantly lower rates of overall complications (7.5% vs 9.8%, Conclusion: In patients undergoing tibial ORIF for distal tibial fractures, adjunctive fibular IM nailing is associated with fewer wound-related complications and infections compared with plate fixation, without compromising union or readmission rates. IM nailing may be a lower-morbidity alternative for selected patients, pending prospective studies that incorporate fracture morphology and functional outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic.