ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
The prognostic value of the preoperative albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective propensity score matching analysis.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluated the prognostic role of the albumin-to-fibrinogen ratio (AFR) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after curative liver resection. Methods: Retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological information of ICC patients and stratified them into two groups by AFR (8.71). A 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to eliminate possible biases. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed using Cox regression analysis, and based on which two nomograms were constructed. The concordance index (C-index), decision curve analysis (DCA), calibration curve, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to validate the nomograms. Results: 559 patients were included and were divided into low- and high-AFR groups, respectively. High-AFR group had better prognosis. The multivariate analysis revealed that AFR was an independent prognostic factor for both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.393, Conclusions: Preoperative AFR was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative OS and DFS in ICC patients, and AFR-based nomograms effectively predict postoperative survival outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.