ArticleInternational journal of population data science2025
Characterising firearm-related databases across Canada: opportunities for data linkage to inform understanding of injury burden and prevention.
Article in International journal of population data science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Firearm injuries are a significant public health issue in Canada, yet the broader consequences, particularly non-fatal injuries, remain under examined in research and policy discussions. These injuries impose long-term physical, psychological, and social burdens on survivors and create substantial economic costs. While firearm-related injury data are collected across health, justice, and policing sectors, the lack of integration between these datasets hampers a comprehensive understanding of the issue. Objectives: This study aims to explore opportunities for linking national, provincial, and municipal datasets on firearm-related injuries in Canada, focusing on data from healthcare, legal, and firearm-specific domains. Methods: A comprehensive search for publications related to firearms of Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science and grey literature up to February 2025 identified several relevant datasets, including health records, death registries, and crime databases. Results: We found that while valuable information exists, the datasets are siloed, limiting the ability to analyse firearm injuries holistically. Gaps in data, such as the psychological impact of firearm injuries and specific details on firearm ownership, further constrain research. Despite these challenges, linking healthcare, justice, and firearm data could offer critical insights into the epidemiology of firearm injuries, their long-term effects, and associated risk factors. Conclusions: Overcoming operational constraints related to privacy, data quality, and funding will be essential for advancing this research and informing evidence-based interventions to reduce firearm-related harm. Drawing from successful data integration initiatives in other jurisdictions, such as Sweden and Australia, this study advocates for the development of a cross-sectoral data linkage strategy to enhance firearm injury prevention and policy development in Canada.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.