Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256224›Full record

ArticleRadiology advances2025

Liver shear wave elastography using a mechanical index exceeding regulatory limits is safe and effective.

Theodore T Pierce, Kim Naja, Scott J Schoen, Rimon Tadross, Michael H Wang, Arinc Ozturk, Kathleen R Pope, David T Hunt, Lauren A Ling, Sunethra K Dayavansha and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05792423 (Improving the Performance of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05792423 nacompletednot on this map

Improving the Performance of Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) in Obese Fatty Liver Disease Patients by Developing a Conditionally Increased Output (CIO) Enhanced Ultrasound System

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled24ConditionsNonalcoholic Fatty Liver, Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Fatty LiverArmsGE ultrasound system with increased acoustic output settings
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Theodore T PierceDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3244-0994
Kim NajaDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Scott J SchoenDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7195-2883
Rimon TadrossComprehensive Care Ultrasound, GE HealthCare, Chicago, IL 60661, United States.
Michael H WangComprehensive Care Ultrasound, GE HealthCare, Chicago, IL 60661, United States.
Arinc OzturkDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5335-3737
Kathleen R PopeDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
David T HuntDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-3595-9884
Lauren A LingDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-6493
Sunethra K DayavanshaDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Mary PetersDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Ann B IafrateDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Nathaniel MercaldoDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Michael J WashburnComprehensive Care Ultrasound, GE HealthCare, Chicago, IL 60661, United States.
Viksit KumarDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.
Kurt SandstromComprehensive Care Ultrasound, GE HealthCare, Chicago, IL 60661, United States.
TaeYun KimComprehensive Care Ultrasound, GE HealthCare, Chicago, IL 60661, United States.
Anthony E SamirDepartment of Radiology, Center for Ultrasound Research & Translation, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7801-8724

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease affects 1 in 3 people worldwide. Ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) in obese patients, the target population for testing, is hampered by beam attenuation, leading to unreliable liver fibrosis quantification. Purpose: We assess the safety and efficacy of increased push mechanical index (IPMI) above U.S. Food and Drug Administration limits to improve SWE. Materials and methods: This single-center prospective trial (July 2023-April 2024) (NCT05792423) enrolled healthy adults stratified by body mass index (BMI). Participants underwent conventional push pulse (mechanical index [MI] 1.4) and IPMI (MI 2.5) SWE (GE Healthcare LOGIQ E10) performed by 1 of 3 sonographers and serial liver function testing (LFT) before and up to 7 days after imaging. Liver injury was defined as increased serum alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (non-inferiority margins: AST 7.5 U/L, ALT 12 U/L, ALP 17.5 U/L). Secondary endpoints included SWE variability and measurement number. Results: Twenty-two analyzable participants (mean age 39.6 ± 16.3 years; 15 women) had normal BMI (6), overweight (6), class 1 obesity (7), and class 2 obesity (3). Conventional shear wave speed was 1.34 ± 0.21 m/s, and IPMI yielded 1.36 ± 0.20 m/s (velocities ≤ 1.34 m/s indicate minimal or no fibrosis). The mean [95% CI] LFT change from baseline to day 1 was 1) AST: -0.86 [-2.34, 0.61], Conclusion: IPMI SWE in healthy volunteers did not cause injury and reduced measurement variability. IPMI SWE should be developed to improve examination quality and reliability in obese patients.

Indexed as

acoustic outputelastographymechanical indexmetabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver diseasesafetyultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41256224
PMCPMC12622962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.