Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256213›Full record

ArticleSmall science2025

Machine Learning-Assisted Prediction of State of Health in Lithium Metal Batteries with Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy.

Jinsoo Yoon, Seoyoung Chae, Chaeyoung Jeong, Minju Lee, Sohui Jang, Kyoohee Woo, Hyungmin Cho, Wooseok Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jinsoo YoonSchool of Chemical Engineering Sungkyunkwan University 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea.
Seoyoung ChaeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering Sungkyunkwan University 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea.
Chaeyoung JeongDepartment of Artificial Intelligence Sungkyunkwan University 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea.
Minju LeeSchool of Chemical Engineering Sungkyunkwan University 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea.
Sohui JangSchool of Chemical Engineering Sungkyunkwan University 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea.
Kyoohee WooDepartment of Advanced Battery Manufacturing Systems Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials (KIMM) 156 Gajeonbuk-ro, Yuseong-gu Daejeon 34103 Republic of Korea.
Hyungmin ChoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering Sungkyunkwan University 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea.
Wooseok YangSchool of Chemical Engineering Sungkyunkwan University 2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu Suwon 16419 Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8750-5682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) offers a nondestructive means of diagnosis for the battery's state of health (SoH). However, traditional equivalent circuit-based approaches-relying on extensive modeling and fitting of complex EIS data such as real and imaginary impedance components, phase shift, and frequency-are time-consuming and heavily dependent on expert interpretation, which can compromise reliability. In this context, artificial intelligence-based models present a faster and more reliable alternative for interpreting EIS data. These models can uncover hidden patterns and parameters that may be overlooked by human experts, thereby enabling more accurate prediction of the battery's SoH. In this study, four machine learning algorithms are employed to predict the SoH of lithium metal batteries based on EIS data, achieving predictive accuracies exceeding 95%. Feature importance analysis indicated that phase shift-an often underutilized parameter in conventional EIS interpretation-plays a critical role in the SoH prediction process. Furthermore, the analysis enabled the attribution of specific EIS features to their corresponding electrochemical phenomena, thereby elucidating the physical basis of the model predictions. The resulting models exhibit high precision in forecasting battery discharge capacity and diagnosing degradation mechanisms, demonstrating their potential as powerful tools for advancing battery diagnostics and performance optimization.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceelectrochemical impedance spectroscopyLi‐metal batteriesmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41256213
PMCPMC12622547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.