Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256181›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Treatment provision and management for the menopause: a multinational survey study.

Nayra A Martin-Key, Erin L Funnell, Sabine Bahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nayra A Martin-KeyDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Cambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Erin L FunnellDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Cambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Sabine BahnDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Cambridge Centre for Neuropsychiatric Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Despite available safe hormonal and non-hormonal interventions, most women with troublesome menopausal symptoms do not receive effective, evidence-based therapy, with notable international disparities in provision. This study aimed to investigate self-reported menopausal care experiences in a self-selecting sample from five English-speaking countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, through an anonymous online survey. Methods: The 15-20 min survey, delivered via Qualtrics XM®, included questions on sociodemographic characteristics and treatment experiences, such as the number of healthcare professionals (HCP) seen before getting a prescription, ease of obtaining treatment, involvement in treatment discussions, appropriateness of treatment review and optimization, side effect tolerability, and overall satisfaction. Results: Data from 3,062 respondents were analyzed: Australia (16.59%, Discussion: Based on a self-selected cohort, these findings reveal critical gaps in menopause care, including disparities in treatment access and international differences in patient involvement. Greater access to healthcare in the UK and the US did not translate into higher satisfaction, highlighting the need for patient-centered approaches. Improving care requires better clinician education and strategies to enhance communication and shared decision-making.

Indexed as

healthcare experienceshealthcare interactionshealth services accessibilitymenopausal treatmentmenopausepatient-centered carepatient satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID41256181
PMCPMC12620394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.