ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Characterizing amyloid and tau PET-based stages across the clinical continuum.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staging the severity of Alzheimer's disease pathology using biomarkers is central to early detection and therapeutic trial design. In this cross-sectional study, we standardized amyloid and tau PET data across multiple cohorts to characterize the frequency of amyloid and tau PET-based stages across the clinical continuum. We examined amyloid and tau severity in 10,396 participants (mean [SD] age, 71.9 [7.1] years) with amyloid PET imaging and a subset (n = 3,295) with tau PET imaging. Clinical stage was defined using cohort-specific criteria and categorized as cognitively unimpaired (n = 7,764), mild cognitive impairment (n = 1,480), or dementia (n = 1,152). Amyloid positivity was defined as ≥25 centiloids and amyloid severity was staged using centiloids bins (e.g., <10, 10-24, 25-49, 50-74, 75-99, ≥100). Tau PET severity was staged using a hierarchical Braak staging schema (e.g., T-, T12+, T34+, T56+), and combined with amyloid status to operationalize PET-based Alzheimer's disease biological stages (e.g., Stage A: A+T-; Stage B: A+T12+; Stage C: A+T34+; Stage D: A+T56+). The cumulative probabilities of PET-based stages were estimated using ordinal logistic regression models. In cognitively unimpaired individuals, the frequency of amyloid levels ≥10 centiloids increased with age. Similarly, amyloid levels ≥25 centiloids increased with age in mild cognitive impairment. Overall, elevated amyloid (≥25 CL) was more likely with increasing age among non-demented individuals. By contrast, this age association was attenuated in dementia where severe amyloid burden (e.g., ≥100 CL) was most common. In the tau PET subsample (n = 3,295), there was a three-way interaction between amyloid, age, and clinical impairment on likelihood of tau severity. Both higher amyloid and greater clinical impairment were associated with increased tau severity; however, the strength and direction of these associations varied with age. At lower amyloid levels, the odds of tau severity increased with older age among cognitively unimpaired and mild cognitive impairment. Conversely, at higher amyloid levels, the odds of higher tau severity (e.g., T56+) decreased with older age in mild cognitive impairment and dementia. A similar age-related pattern was observed in the frequency of biological stages (n = 1,154), where Stage D (e.g., A+T56+) was most frequent in younger individuals with dementia. These findings underscore the dual importance of amyloid and tau PET severity as biomarkers for staging and characterizing Alzheimer's disease progression. They also demonstrate the feasibility of applying PET-based staging frameworks for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease across multiple tracers and cohorts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.