ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Predicting Acute Cerebrovascular Events in Stroke Alerts Using Large-Language Models and Structured Data.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Acute stroke alerts are often activated for non-cerebrovascular conditions, leading to false positives that strain clinical resources and promote diagnostic uncertainty. We sought to develop machine learning (ML) models integrating large-language models (LLMs), structured electronic health record data, and clinical time series data to predict the presence of acute cerebrovascular disease (ACD) at stroke alert activation. Methods: We derived a series of ML models using retrospective data from stroke alerts activated at Mount Sinai Health System between 2011 and 2021. We extracted structured data (demographics, medical comorbidities, medications, and engineered time-series features from vital signs and lab results) as well as unstructured clinical notes available prior to the time of stroke alert. We processed clinical notes using three embedding approaches: word embeddngs, biomedical embeddings (BioWordVec), and LLMs. Using a radiographic gold standard for acute intracranial vascular event, we used an auto-ML approach to train one model based on unstructured data and five models based on different combinations of structured data. We evaluated models individually using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), mean positive predictive value (PPV), sensitivity, and F1-score. We then combined the 6 model logits into a multimodal ensemble by weighting their logits based on F1-score, determining ensemble performance using the same metrics. Results: We identified 16,512 stroke alerts corresponding to 14,233 unique patients over the study period, of which 9,013 (54.6%) were due to ACD. The multi-modal model (AUROC 0.72, PPV 0.68, sensitivity 0.76, F1 0.72) outperformed all individual models by AUROC. One structured model based on demographics, comorbidities, and medications demonstrated the highest sensitivity (0.95). Conclusions: We developed a multi-modal ML model to predict ACD at stroke alert activation. This approach has promise to optimize stroke triage and reduce false-positive activations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.