Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256096›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Interaction of repetition and retention interval influences the transfer effect after answer feedback for episodic memory.

Lingwei Wang, Jiongjiong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lingwei WangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Jiongjiong YangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Retrieval practice with answer feedback is an efficient way to enhance episodic memory, but previous studies fail to find a robust transfer of learning for non-trained information. The aim of this study was to clarify the boundary conditions for the transfer effect after answer feedback. Methods: Two groups of participants learned episodic sentences through single or repeated study and training (ST, SSTT), then they were tested at 10 min, 1 day and 1 week. During the training phase, only half of the items were trained under conditions of feedback, no feedback, or restudy, while the other half items were not trained. Results: The transfer effect (i.e., feedback vs. restudy condition for the non-trained items) was influenced by the interaction of repetition and retention interval, as it appeared at 10 min after SSTT but not after ST. Moreover, the transfer effect declined over time, and was significantly lower than chance level at 1 week after SSTT. Discussion: The results suggest that the transfer effect after answer feedback could be obtained after repeated study and training for the episodic information, but it is short-lived. They also highlight the time change of memory specificity and generalization due to answer feedback.

Indexed as

answer feedbackepisodic memoryrepetitionretention intervaltransfer effect

Identifiers

PMID41256096
PMCPMC12620480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.