ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Interaction of repetition and retention interval influences the transfer effect after answer feedback for episodic memory.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Design, implementation, and evaluation of IIIDDS: a structured WhatsApp case-discussion curriculum in undergraduate radiology education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Retrieval practice with answer feedback is an efficient way to enhance episodic memory, but previous studies fail to find a robust transfer of learning for non-trained information. The aim of this study was to clarify the boundary conditions for the transfer effect after answer feedback. Methods: Two groups of participants learned episodic sentences through single or repeated study and training (ST, SSTT), then they were tested at 10 min, 1 day and 1 week. During the training phase, only half of the items were trained under conditions of feedback, no feedback, or restudy, while the other half items were not trained. Results: The transfer effect (i.e., feedback vs. restudy condition for the non-trained items) was influenced by the interaction of repetition and retention interval, as it appeared at 10 min after SSTT but not after ST. Moreover, the transfer effect declined over time, and was significantly lower than chance level at 1 week after SSTT. Discussion: The results suggest that the transfer effect after answer feedback could be obtained after repeated study and training for the episodic information, but it is short-lived. They also highlight the time change of memory specificity and generalization due to answer feedback.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.