SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2025
Benefits of forest therapy for adult mental health: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Profile of Mood States (POMS).
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapist-Guided Forest Therapy in Adolescents: Operational Feasibility and Anxiety-Symptom Signals from a Two-Classroom Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Forest Bathing (Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Potential preventive effects of forest bathing/Shinrin-yoku on depressive symptoms: a narrative review of mechanistic evidence.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of Forest Therapy on Depressive Symptoms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to assess the effects of forest therapy on human mental health through meta-analytic methods and to examine the moderating variables that influence this relationship. The goal is to provide a scientific basis for optimizing forest therapy interventions tailored to different populations to enhance mental health outcomes. Methods: Databases such as CNKI, Wanfang, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were utilized for data collection, and data processing was performed using EndNote X9 and Stata 16.0 statistical software. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect size indicators for the meta-analysis, and relevant moderator variables were tested. Results: The study analyzed three subgroups based on intervention duration, exercise intensity, and participant origin. Subgroup 1 ( Conclusion: Forest therapy has been shown to effectively alleviate anxiety, anger, depression, fatigue, and confusion, while also enhancing vitality. However, when the duration of the therapy is less than one hour, its effects on reducing fatigue and enhancing vitality are less pronounced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.