ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Postural correlates of visual incentives: application to food and alcohol stimuli.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain signature of food and alcohol stimuli processing: a comparative EEG study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Alcohol consumption is a major public health concern, linked to numerous diseases, including neurological disorders. Building on research into the interaction between emotion and motor processes, posturography has proven useful for studying how socioaffective information influences body sway. Few studies have explored this under motivational conditions, with limited work on food or alcohol cues. Methods: Fifty-five healthy participants viewed visual stimuli in four conditions (neutral-alcohol, alcohol, neutral-food, food) while their postural responses were recorded. After the experiment, participants rated each stimulus on pleasantness, unpleasantness, consumption, approach, avoidance, and intensity. Results: Subjective ratings differed significantly between conditions. Postural variability and movement amplitude were modulated by both incentive type (food vs. alcohol) and valence (incentive vs. neutral). Notably, food cues increased postural movement, whereas alcohol cues decreased it. Discussion: These findings highlight distinct motor signatures for different appetitive cues and contribute to understanding how emotions and motivation shape embodied responses to environmental stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.