Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256082›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2025

Mapping the Azygos System: An Evaluation from Age and Sex Perspectives.

Gülsüm Derya Aktaş, Mustafa Koplay, Ahmet Kağan Karabulut, Muzaffer Sindel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gülsüm Derya AktaşDepartment of Anatomy, İzmir Democracy University, Faculty of Medicine, İzmir, Türkiye.
Mustafa KoplayDepartment of Radiology, Selçuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye.
Ahmet Kağan KarabulutDepartment of Anatomy, Selçuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye.
Muzaffer SindelDepartment of Anatomy, Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Antalya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The azygos system serves as a vital pathway between the superior and inferior vena cava in cases of obstruction. Despite its significance, there is a lack of detailed imaging studies describing its anatomy. Accurate characterization of its appearance and dimensions on computed tomography is essential, as it may be mistaken for lymph nodes or masses. This study aimed to define the azygos system using computed tomography. Materials and Methods: Thoracic computed tomography images from 300 individuals (aged 18-87 years) were analyzed. The study assessed the level at which the azygos vein drains into the superior vena cava, the highest point of the azygos arch, and the course and diameter of the azygos vein. Additionally, the presence, termination levels, and diameters of the hemiazygos and accessory hemiazygos veins were recorded. Results: The azygos vein most commonly drained into the superior vena cava at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra. In only 23 individuals did the azygos vein course on the right of the midline. The mean diameters of the azygos, hemiazygos, and accessory hemiazygos veins were 6.37 mm, 3.95 mm, and 3.12 mm, respectively. Conclusion: This study is significant in demonstrating that the junction of the azygos vein with the superior vena cava junction most commonly occurs at the level of the fifth thoracic vertebra. Additionally, the azygos vein reaches the midline in 53% of cases and crosses to the left in 39%.

Indexed as

Anatomyazygos veincomputed tomographythoracic surgerythorax

Identifiers

PMID41256082
PMCPMC12478844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.