ArticleSurgery open science2025
Clinical and financial outcomes associated with gastrointestinal complications among patients with type B aortic dissection.
Article in Surgery open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of Hospital Volume With Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism in the United States.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastrointestinal complications (GIC) are an uncommon but serious sequelae of type B aortic dissection (TBAD), potentially contributing to increased mortality and healthcare resource utilization. Limited studies have characterized these complications among TBAD patients. The present work sought to evaluate the clinical and financial implications of GIC and identifies factors associated with their development. Methods: All hospitalizations entailing a primary diagnosis of TBAD were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified into those who developed GIC and those who did not. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospitalization costs, and the need for abdominal surgery. Multivariable logistic and linear regressions were employed to assess associations between patient, facility, and treatment factors with clinical and financial outcomes. Results: Of 24,927 TBAD hospitalizations, 2.5 % developed GIC, and 24.0 % of these cases required an abdominal procedure. Patients with GIC were younger (median 61 vs. 67 years; Conclusions: GIC in TBAD patients was associated with substantial clinical and financial burdens. Further study of early identification and targeted interventions is warranted to mitigate these complications and optimize resource utilization in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.