ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2024
Comparison of Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) Antibody Response by Different Vaccine Combinations.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Various types and combinations of vaccines have been utilized at different time intervals due to the variable availability of vaccines in many countries during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Most current vaccine administrations involve a series of primary doses followed by a homologous booster dose. This study aimed to examine the antibody levels after the BNT162b2 or CoronaVac vaccine was administered as a booster dose to volunteers who received two doses of CoronaVac and to identify the ideal vaccination combination. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 254 participants. The groups consisted of volunteers who received two doses of CoronaVac, those who received two doses of BNT162b2, those who received two doses of CoronaVac plus one dose of BNT162b2, and finally, those who received three doses of CoronaVac. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) specific spike (S) Immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels were measured by electrochemiluminescence method on Roche COBAS 8000 series using Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S kit. Results: Antibody levels after three doses of CoronaVac were found to be lower compared to after two doses of CoronaVac + one dose BNT162b2 (p<0.001). IgG responses after three doses of the CoronaVac vaccine (two primary + one booster dose) were lower than those after two doses of BNT162b2 (p<0.001). Conclusion: The use of a heterogeneous booster dose due to problems in vaccine supply may be a good alternative to the homologous approaches applied so far.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.