Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255940›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

Potential Tool Use by Wolves (

Kyle A Artelle, Paul C Paquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Potential Tool Use by Wolves (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyle A ArtelleCenter for Native Peoples and the Environment, Department of Environmental Biology State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Syracuse New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-5693
Paul C PaquetDepartment of Geography University of Victoria Victoria BC Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4844-2559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cognitive abilities of canids are increasingly recognized, though insights from noncaptive populations are comparatively rare. Recently, recurring damage to crab traps used by Haíɫzaqv Nation Guardians to control a European Green Crab invasion was investigated with remote cameras. A wolf was recorded emerging from the water carrying a crab trap buoy, then sequentially pulling the attached line up the beach until an initially submerged trap emerged from the water. The wolf then extracted the bait cup from within and consumed the bait. The recorded behavior, combined with similarly extracted and damaged traps nearby, suggests a sophisticated understanding of the trap and sophisticated cognition more broadly. This observation raises questions about the context and origins of the behavior and prompts consideration of our relationship with this cognitively complex species.

Indexed as

animal behaviorcanid cognitionCanis lupustool use

Identifiers

PMID41255940
PMCPMC12622305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.