Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255917›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2025

Telehealth clinical learning: understanding pre-clerkship medical student experiences.

Meera Anand, Sarah Wood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Authorship in medical education.Canadian medical education journal · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meera AnandDepartment of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah WoodUniversity of Dundee, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a reliance upon telehealth patient visits emerged. Many medical schools use early clinical experiences in the pre-clerkship years to provide opportunities to practice evolving clinical skills and broaden classroom learning. However, little is known about the value of telehealth visits during the pre-clerkship years. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to determine what student learning experiences were with telehealth patient encounters during early clinical experiences. Methods: In this qualitative study, we used a descriptive phenomenological approach. We interviewed medical students using Zoom to gather their lived experiences. We grouped key findings into themes. Results: Seventeen medical students participated in the study. Key challenges included the loss of body language and visual cues leading to challenges with rapport building, the inability to perform physical examinations, and less involvement and independent practice of skills. However, positive aspects include good opportunities for history taking and benefits to note-taking. Mentorship with preceptors remained either positive or similar to in-person experiences. Conclusion: Since telehealth remains an important part of healthcare, it is crucial to train learners in telehealth clinical environments alongside standard in-person environments. However, while both challenges and benefits exist with telehealth clinical visits for junior learners, active learning processes, the use of video augmentation and robust faculty development strategies remain important to increase the educational value of these visits.

Indexed as

Clinical ClerkshipEducation, Medical, UndergraduateStudents, MedicalTelemedicineClinical CompetenceCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID41255917
PMCPMC12620730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.