ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2024
Gastric Perforation due to Cervical Cancer Metastasis.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is the most prevalent subtype of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. It is well-known for its local infiltration and a high frequency of lymphonodal invasion, but distant hematogenous metastases are uncommon. Case Report: This case report highlights the rare occurrence of gastric perforation resulting from metastatic uterine cervical SqCC. A 56-year-old woman, initially treated for cervical cancer, presented with severe abdominal pain and vomiting. Emergency laparotomy revealed a prepyloric stomach perforation. Subsequent subtotal gastrectomy confirmed high-grade malignancy with atypical cells infiltrating the stomach. The literature on gastric metastasis from cervical cancer is limited, making this case noteworthy. Surgical intervention and postoperative therapy were recommended, although the patient's deteriorating health delayed the planned treatment. Conclusion: While only three similar cases have been reported, emphasizing the need for early radical treatment and postoperative care, this case underlines the complexity and lack of standardized protocols in managing such rare metastatic scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.