ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Research on the estimation method of crop net primary productivity based on improved CASA model.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Net Primary Productivity Retrieval Based on ESTARFM Fusion and an Improved CASA Model.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Net Primary Productivity (NPP) is a vital indicator for evaluating the carbon source and sink capacities of ecosystems, significantly influencing assessments of agricultural productivity and carbon cycle studies. Accurately estimating NPP in the agricultural sector, however, remains challenging. This research addresses the challenge by refining the estimation of the Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) within the CASA model, introducing a novel methodology that significantly improves the accuracy of NPP estimation and, when applied to remote sensing imagery covering a broad region, demonstrates strong potential for large-scale crop NPP monitoring. We employed high-resolution Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and the Recursive Feature Elimination algorithm to extract FPAR-related features from 15 vegetation indices. The FPAR was subsequently estimated using a Convolutional Neural Network, leading to a dramatic decrease in the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from 0.2040 to 0.0020. The prediction errors for the improved model ranged from 0.0001 to 0.0092, with a mean absolute error (MAE) below 0.01. These values reflect the distribution of absolute residuals and indicate a substantial enhancement in accuracy over traditional methods. This improved FPAR estimation method was subsequently integrated into the CASA model. Compared to field-measured NPP data, the optimized model reduced the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) from 28.92% to 20.31%. The MAPE values across the test samples ranged between 15% and 25%, indicating a significant improvement in model reliability. The optimized CASA model performs well in estimating net primary productivity (NPP) of crops, providing strong support for agricultural decision-making and future research on large-scale productivity and carbon cycling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.