Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255889›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025

Research on the estimation method of crop net primary productivity based on improved CASA model.

Wanning Li, Zhuo Wang, Chunling Chen, Ying Yin, Yuanji Cai, Hao Han, Minghuan Liu, Ziyi Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wanning LiCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Zhuo WangCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Chunling ChenCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Ying YinCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Yuanji CaiCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Hao HanCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.
Minghuan LiuHenan Provincial Key Lab of Hydrosphere and Watershed Water Security, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, China.
Ziyi FengCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Net Primary Productivity (NPP) is a vital indicator for evaluating the carbon source and sink capacities of ecosystems, significantly influencing assessments of agricultural productivity and carbon cycle studies. Accurately estimating NPP in the agricultural sector, however, remains challenging. This research addresses the challenge by refining the estimation of the Fraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FPAR) within the CASA model, introducing a novel methodology that significantly improves the accuracy of NPP estimation and, when applied to remote sensing imagery covering a broad region, demonstrates strong potential for large-scale crop NPP monitoring. We employed high-resolution Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and the Recursive Feature Elimination algorithm to extract FPAR-related features from 15 vegetation indices. The FPAR was subsequently estimated using a Convolutional Neural Network, leading to a dramatic decrease in the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from 0.2040 to 0.0020. The prediction errors for the improved model ranged from 0.0001 to 0.0092, with a mean absolute error (MAE) below 0.01. These values reflect the distribution of absolute residuals and indicate a substantial enhancement in accuracy over traditional methods. This improved FPAR estimation method was subsequently integrated into the CASA model. Compared to field-measured NPP data, the optimized model reduced the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) from 28.92% to 20.31%. The MAPE values across the test samples ranged between 15% and 25%, indicating a significant improvement in model reliability. The optimized CASA model performs well in estimating net primary productivity (NPP) of crops, providing strong support for agricultural decision-making and future research on large-scale productivity and carbon cycling.

Indexed as

CASA modelcrop monitoringFraction of Photosynthetically Active Radiation (FRAR)net primary productivity (NPP)vegetation index

Identifiers

PMID41255889
PMCPMC12620451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.