Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255855›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

A multimodal dataset for process monitoring and anomaly detection in industrial CNC milling.

Robin Ströbel, Maximilian Kuck, Florian Oexle, Hafez Kader, Alexander Puchta, Benjamin Noack, Jürgen Fleischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robin Ströbelwbk Institute of Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Maximilian Kuckwbk Institute of Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Florian Oexlewbk Institute of Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Hafez KaderAMS-Autonomous Multisensor Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Alexander Puchtawbk Institute of Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Benjamin NoackAMS-Autonomous Multisensor Systems, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.
Jürgen Fleischerwbk Institute of Production Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the fourth industrial revolution, agile production methods have gained increasing importance to meet the growing demand for product individualization. Conventional process monitoring systems, which predominantly rely on static, statistically based approaches, are insufficient for the requirements of flexible manufacturing environments. Although numerous research initiatives have proposed machine learning (ML) based solutions for agile process monitoring, widespread adoption in industrial practice has not yet been achieved. This is partly due to a lack of system comparability and insufficient validation under realistic production conditions. To address this, a comprehensive dataset was recorded on a DMC 60 H three-axis milling machine by Deckel Maho. The dataset comprises multiple signals from a Siemens SINUMERIK 840D controller, recorded at 500 Hz via a Siemens SINUMERIK Edge. These were synchronized with force and acceleration data (sampled at 10 kHz) captured via a force measurement platform and acceleration sensors. A total of 32 experiments were conducted (15 with 8 distinct anomaly types), resulting in nearly 8 million data points per signal and six hours of process data. Key features include: • Realistic workpiece geometries (thermoforming molds, injection molds, pump impellers) representing diverse milling scenarios. • Multiple anomalies (e.g., tool wear, chatter, material defects) to enable targeted validation. • Full reproducibility through provided NC codes, CAD models, and raw/processed data formats (.json, .mat, .csv, .stp, .nc). The dataset is intended to serve as a benchmark for industrial stakeholders to evaluate monitoring systems, as well as providing researchers with a secondary resource for benchmarking and optimizing ML-based approaches. By fostering comparability, it aims to bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and industrial application.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionCNCMachine toolMillingProcess monitoring

Identifiers

PMID41255855
PMCPMC12621317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.