ArticleData in brief2025
A multimodal dataset for process monitoring and anomaly detection in industrial CNC milling.
Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-sensor and MTConnect dataset of metal cutting anomaly in milling from laboratory and industry settings.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the fourth industrial revolution, agile production methods have gained increasing importance to meet the growing demand for product individualization. Conventional process monitoring systems, which predominantly rely on static, statistically based approaches, are insufficient for the requirements of flexible manufacturing environments. Although numerous research initiatives have proposed machine learning (ML) based solutions for agile process monitoring, widespread adoption in industrial practice has not yet been achieved. This is partly due to a lack of system comparability and insufficient validation under realistic production conditions. To address this, a comprehensive dataset was recorded on a DMC 60 H three-axis milling machine by Deckel Maho. The dataset comprises multiple signals from a Siemens SINUMERIK 840D controller, recorded at 500 Hz via a Siemens SINUMERIK Edge. These were synchronized with force and acceleration data (sampled at 10 kHz) captured via a force measurement platform and acceleration sensors. A total of 32 experiments were conducted (15 with 8 distinct anomaly types), resulting in nearly 8 million data points per signal and six hours of process data. Key features include: • Realistic workpiece geometries (thermoforming molds, injection molds, pump impellers) representing diverse milling scenarios. • Multiple anomalies (e.g., tool wear, chatter, material defects) to enable targeted validation. • Full reproducibility through provided NC codes, CAD models, and raw/processed data formats (.json, .mat, .csv, .stp, .nc). The dataset is intended to serve as a benchmark for industrial stakeholders to evaluate monitoring systems, as well as providing researchers with a secondary resource for benchmarking and optimizing ML-based approaches. By fostering comparability, it aims to bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and industrial application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.