Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255850›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Narrative review of the scientific and methodological explanations for 101 mechanisms of opioid tolerance.

Michael M Morgan, Erin N Bobeck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael M MorganDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-8557
Erin N BobeckDepartment of Biology, Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program in Neuroscience, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA.

Funding

Investigation of the endogenous opioid neural circuitry in painR03DA058194 · NIDA · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOBECK, ERIN NICOLE · 2023 to 2024
$146k
NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA058194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioids such as morphine and fentanyl are widely prescribed treatments for pain. Unfortunately, opioid use is limited by side effects, dependence, and the development of tolerance with repeated use. A major goal of preclinical opioid research is to identify the neural mechanisms underlying tolerance to opioids to provide better pain management and reduce side effects caused by high opioid doses. To that end, preclinical pain researchers have reported well over 101 mechanisms of opioid tolerance. The objective of this review is to describe both the scientific explanations for multiple mechanisms of opioid tolerance (eg, different types of opioid tolerance, different mechanisms at different locations and for different opioids) and the methodological problems that cause false positives. For example, many changes correlate with but do not cause tolerance. Opioid binding to mu-opioid receptors (MOR) activates a signaling cascade that includes numerous molecules and cells making it difficult to identify the precise mechanism causing tolerance. Other problems, such as lack of appropriate control groups or confounds produced by antinociceptive or motor effects of the treatment, are surprisingly common. Solutions to these problems are presented at the end of the article in the hope of guiding future research. Although the focus is on opioid tolerance, the problems and solutions presented here apply to tolerance to other drugs and any neural change that occurs over time such as learning.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAntinociceptionMorphine tolerancePain

Identifiers

PMID41255850
PMCPMC12622723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.