Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255847›Full record

ArticlePain reports2025

Comparative study evaluating the efficacy of duloxetine, gabapentin, and lacosamide on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Sally Said Tantawy, Osama Mohamed Ibrahim, Sahar Mohamed El-Haggar, Mohamed Abouelfetouh Shehata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sally Said TantawyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7352-2825
Osama Mohamed IbrahimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Sahar Mohamed El-HaggarDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Mohamed Abouelfetouh ShehataDepartment of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral neuropathic pain limits oxaliplatin use and negatively impacts patients' quality of life. Objectives: This study was conducted to assess the impact of gabapentin and lacosamide on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy compared with duloxetine. Methods: In this randomized, double-blind study, 93 patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX-4 regimen: folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) were assigned to 1 of 3 groups. Group 1 received duloxetine 30 mg/d, group 2 received gabapentin 300 mg/d, and group 3 received lacosamide 50 mg/d throughout 12 chemotherapy cycles. Neuropathy was assessed using the McGill Pain Questionnaire, 12-item neurotoxicity questionnaire (NTX-12), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, and grading according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Serum neuroinflammatory biomarkers, including nuclear factor kappa B, neurotensin, neurofilament light chain, and heme oxygenase-1, were also evaluated, along with adverse drug effects. Results: At cycles 10 and 12, the incidence of grade 2 to 3 neuropathy was significantly lower with duloxetine and lacosamide compared with gabapentin (45.2% and 32.2% vs 70.9%, Conclusions: Lacosamide demonstrated neuroprotective efficacy comparable with duloxetine and may represent a promising therapeutic option for oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Indexed as

DuloxetineGabapentinLacosamideOxaliplatinPeripheral neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID41255847
PMCPMC12622614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.