Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255819›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2025

Ethical, legal, and sociocultural considerations in neural device explantation: a systematic review.

Manuela Vooijs, Katherine Bassil, Anne van den Brink, Odile C van Stuijvenberg, Nick F Ramsey, Karin R Jongsma

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manuela VooijsVU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Katherine BassilBioethics & Health Humanities, Julius Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anne van den BrinkBioethics & Health Humanities, Julius Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Odile C van StuijvenbergBioethics & Health Humanities, Julius Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Nick F RamseyDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Karin R JongsmaBioethics & Health Humanities, Julius Center, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Implantable neural devices, including brain-computer interfaces and spinal cord stimulators, hold significant therapeutic promise for conditions such as paralysis and chronic pain. However, the novelty of these technologies introduces unique ethical challenges. While much of the existing literature emphasizes development-related concerns such as device safety, the ethical issues surrounding explantation remain relatively underexplored. Methods: We conducted a systematic review to identify ethical, legal, and sociocultural considerations relevant to the explantation of neural devices. The review applied the IEEE BRAIN Neuroethics framework as a guiding structure for the categorization of the themes. A subsequent thematic analysis was performed to categorize and synthesize findings across studies. Results: Thematic analysis revealed that medical motives were the predominant factor in discussions of explantation, with 83% of studies citing medical complications as a central concern. Additional themes identified included changes in cognition and behavior, emotional well-being, lack of therapeutic benefit, identity, financial issues, autonomy, post-trial considerations, and neurorights. Discussion: Our findings underscore the multifaceted nature of neural device explantation, extending beyond purely medical considerations to include psychological, financial, legal, and sociocultural dimensions. These results highlight the necessity of interdisciplinary approaches to adequately address the broad spectrum of challenges associated with explantation.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfacesclinical trialethicsexplantationneural implantsneurodevicesresearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID41255819
PMCPMC12621010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.