ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2023
A Home Education Technique for Inhaler Devices Used by Patients with Obstructive Lung Disease.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Feedback from multiple international centers has revealed inhaler device handling errors in obstructive lung disease patients over several years. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an easy-to-apply and continuous inhaler device education method that may be implemented in a hospital setting and continued at home. Materials and Methods: A total of 60 patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who had >2/10 critical errors in using their inhaler devices were included in the study. They received training on how to use their inhalers, and were then divided into two equal groups. Group 1 consisted of control patients who did not receive any additional education. Group 2 patients had the steps for inhaler administration recorded as voice commands on their mobile phones, and also received reminders for medication administration time. All patients were followed for six months to evaluate the outcome of the training. Results: Among the patients, 86.7% were unaware that they were misusing their inhaler devices. In Group 1, the success rate was 56.7% after the first education session in the clinic. However, after six months, none of the patients in Group were successful. On the other hand, in Group 2, the success rate was 46.7% at the end of the first education session, and this was maintained at the sixth-month follow-up. Conclusion: Patients may not be aware of their mistakes in handling inhaler devices, and may forget the correct steps over time. This study supports the use of phone applications for providing continuous education, which may help to increase the success of inhaler treatment. Such applications could be adapted for use in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.