ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Exploration of enhanced recovery after surgery in female pelvic floor reconstruction: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Enhanced recovery after surgery reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecological surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of the status and influencing factors of early ambulation in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction after surgery.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition treated with pelvic floor reconstruction surgery, which can be associated with significant postoperative morbidity. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol specifically for this procedure. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 80 patients undergoing POP surgery between March 2022 and March 2023; 39 were managed with the ERAS protocol and 41 received conventional care. The ERAS pathway comprised multimodal interventions across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Primary outcomes were postoperative length of stay (LOS) and hospitalization costs. Results: The ERAS group had a significantly shorter postoperative LOS (112.14 vs. 154.87 h, Conclusion: The implementation of the ERAS protocol for pelvic floor reconstruction is safe, feasible, and effective, leading to accelerated recovery, shortened hospital stay, and reduced cost, without compromising patient safety or satisfaction. These findings support the broader adoption of ERAS in POP surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.