ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2025
Adopting an Integrative and Co-Design Process to Contextualize Management Capacity Building in Hospitals.
Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Context plays a critical role in shaping how interventions are designed and implemented, and must therefore be considered prior to implementation. There is consensus that the relationship between contextual factors and intervention outcomes is best understood using qualitative and quantitative methods, the process for considering and incorporating context remains unclear. Drawing on a recently completed study focusing on building hospital management capacity, this paper describes and discusses the benefits and learning from the implementation of an integrative and co-design approach. Methods: This sequential mixed-methods study included managers and clinicians from two district hospitals in China. Focus Group Discussions [FGD] are a critical step in guiding the adaptation of several validated tools in the local hospital context. Data collected from FGDs and online surveys provides a comprehensive understanding of the current state of hospitals. Results: This study identified a wide range of difficulties faced by mid-level managers and clinical staff in two hospitals. While managers reported hospital-specific challenges, staff across both sites consistently cited issues such as inadequate support, lack of recognition, and lack of patient trust. Survey results also revealed low levels of psychological empowerment, job satisfaction, and perceived leadership effectiveness. Self-assessment using the MCAP tool highlighted significant competency gaps among mid-level managers, particularly in operations management and leading change. Discussion: The use of a co-design approach broadly engaging relevant key stakeholders from the design and implementation of the project and formulation of improvement strategies is key to enabling project success and maximizing and sustaining project impact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.