Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255562›Full record

ReviewJournal of healthcare leadership2025

Compassion in Healthcare: A Narrative Review of Cross-Cultural Perspectives.

Dev Bandhu Poudel, Muhammad Aledeh, Nazia Parveen, Mehwish Ishfaq, Lucie-May Golbourn, Yumna Ali, Carlo Lazzari, Yasuhiro Kotera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dev Bandhu PoudelDepartment of Humanities and Social Sciences, G. P. Koirala Memorial (Community) College, Kathmandu, Bagmati, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-3672-185X
Muhammad AledehDepartment of Psychiatry, Donaustadt Clinic, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund (Vienna Healthcare Group), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-9005
Nazia ParveenDepartment of Applied Psychology, National University of Modern Languages (NUML), Multan Campus, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0000-0251-3828
Mehwish IshfaqDepartment of Professional Psychology, Bahria University H-11 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Lucie-May GolbournDepartment of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9202-8697
Yumna AliDepartment of Psychology, Hazara University, Mansehra, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5364-5238
Carlo LazzariFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Yasuhiro KoteraFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0251-0085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Compassion is a critical component of effective, ethical healthcare, influencing patient care, provider well-being, and organizational culture. Its expression and support vary across cultures, yet little is known about how systemic and cultural factors shape compassionate care. This narrative review examines compassion's impact on healthcare practices across cultural contexts. Methods: A narrative review of literature published since 2020, searching PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science was performed. Fifteen studies met our inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed, English-language articles that explicitly examined compassion (or closely related constructs such as self-compassion or compassion fatigue) in healthcare settings and reported empirical, theoretical, or review evidence with attention to cultural or contextual factors. Excluded were articles published before 2020, non-English reports, conference abstracts, and opinion pieces lacking empirical or theoretical contribution. Results: Compassion-focused interventions reduced fatigue and improved self-compassion and satisfaction. Cultural and systemic factors influenced how compassion was understood and applied, from Buddhist-informed to Western models. Institutional culture, leadership, workload, and spiritual care affected practice, while mental health and community care showed benefits but faced systemic barriers. Conclusion: Compassion in healthcare is shaped by individual, cultural, organizational, and systemic factors. Embedding compassion across all these levels is essential for delivering effective, person-centered care. This review contributes by synthesizing recent cross-cultural evidence, highlighting how cultural, structural, and spiritual dimensions influence compassionate care, and identifying gaps in global research. Cross-cultural awareness and structural reform are critical for sustaining compassionate healthcare. Future research should explore underrepresented cultural contexts and evaluate systemic interventions that promote compassion in diverse health systems.

Indexed as

compassionate carecompassion fatiguecross-culturalnarrative reviewself-compassionsystemic barriers

Identifiers

PMID41255562
PMCPMC12620508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.