ArticleSouth African journal of sports medicine2025
The psychometric properties of the exercise dependence scale among South African university students.
Article in South African journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exercise dependence is a maladaptive pattern of exercise that can lead to physical and psychological impairment. This phenomenon can be assessed using the Exercise Dependence Scale (EDS-R). However, the reliability and validity of the scale have yet to be established for the South African context. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to verify the factorial structure and reliability of the Exercise Dependence Scale among South African university students. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 486 university students (176 males and 303 females, 4 non-binary and 3 participants not willing to disclose their gender) with a range of ages between 18 and 62 (23±6 years) who were invited to complete an online questionnaire comprising a demographic questionnaire and the EDS-R. Results: Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the seven-factor model of the EDS-R, with all subscales demonstrating acceptable to high internal consistency (α=0.75-0.94). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated good model fit indices (Comparative fit index = 0.96, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.95, Root mean square error of approximation = 0.06, 90% CI: 0.05-0.070, Standardised root mean square error residual = 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, the results of this study indicate an acceptable fit index, confirming the 7-factor structure of the EDS-R. However, it would be beneficial to remove item 10 from this scale for the South African content or consider rephrasing items 10 and 19. Further research is needed to investigate and verify the factorial structure of the EDS-R in the South African context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.