Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255518›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of educational technology in higher education2025

Ethical considerations for teaching with artificial intelligence: a scoping review in medical education settings.

Amani Itani, Susie L Gronseth, Salma Musaad, Thuy Nguyen, Yiming Mirabile, Bettina M Beech

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of educational technology in higher education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amani ItaniDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Houston, 3623 Cullen Blvd., Room 2030 McElhinney Hall, Houston, TX 77204-5023 USA.
Susie L GronsethDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Houston, 3623 Cullen Blvd., Room 2030 McElhinney Hall, Houston, TX 77204-5023 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3535-3493
Salma MusaadChildren's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Thuy NguyenChildren's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Yiming MirabileChildren's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Bettina M BeechUH Population Health, University of Houston, Houston, USA.

Funding

AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center - All Four CoresOT2OD032581 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Paul Avillach, Bettina M. Beech · 2021 to 2026
$168.7M
NIH HHS OT2 OD032581
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the evolving realm of medical education, where artificial intelligence (AI) technologies play an increasingly pivotal role, embedding AI ethics within educational frameworks has become crucial. This scoping review explores the breadth of literature concerning ethical considerations for teaching with AI in medical education settings. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines, the team analyzed 82 peer-reviewed English-language articles published between 2018 and October 2023, sourced from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The review presents insights into the geographic distribution of studies, publication trends, article types, common keywords, areas of focus, and ethical considerations. Ethical considerations are framed around the core principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and transparency. Emerging themes and notable gaps are identified, offering suggested directions for future research. Review articles were found to be the most common study type, and "artificial intelligence" and "education" were the most frequently recurring keywords in the articles. The articles primarily focused on (a) incorporating AI in medical education, (b) AI ethical principles in medical education, and (c) ChatGPT in healthcare education. Ethical concerns raised in the articles centered on privacy, bias, informed consent, and algorithmic transparency, with many offering implications for curriculum development. These findings underscore the significance of integrating AI tools as instructional aids to enhance medical education, improve student learning experiences, and address the ethical challenges associated with their use in instructional settings. Future research opportunities include refining standardized competencies for AI in medical education, developing evidence-based curricula, and conducting longitudinal studies to assess AI's long-term impact on learning outcomes.

Indexed as

AIEDAI ethicsAI in educationArtificial intelligenceChatGPTCurriculum developmentMedical educationScoping review

Identifiers

PMID41255518
PMCPMC12620316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.