ReviewCureus2025
A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Autologous Fat Transfer: Fat Transfer Confers a 4.2% Incidence of Complications.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reporting of complications such as infection, necrosis, oil cysts and haematoma after fat transfer varies widely in the literature. Numerous variations in techniques (for example, cannula size, infiltration solution and fat-processing methods) have been described across a heterogeneous patient population for age, fat harvest location and recipient site. To date, no comprehensive review of the literature has been performed for all fat transfer procedures across the body. This study aims to provide novel information on the incidence of complications after fat transfer and is unique in its size and scope. A systematic review of English literature was performed from 01/01/08 to 01/09/24 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Measured complication outcomes included necrosis, infection, induration, oil cysts, haematoma and pneumothorax. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled complication incidence from selected articles. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 articles progressed to final analysis with a total of 6268 patients. Major complications investigated were fat necrosis (n=44, 0.7%), infection (n=66, 1%), induration and calcification (n=40, 0.6%), oil cysts (n=7, 0.1%) and haematoma (n=4, 0.06%). Pneumothorax post-procedure incidence was 0.1% (n=6). Overall complication incidence was 4.2%. This study is unique in its scope and size and can be used for counselling patients in the pre-operative setting, providing a benchmark for surgeons to assess their practice with an overall complication incidence of 4.2%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.