Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255499›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of Autologous Fat Transfer: Fat Transfer Confers a 4.2% Incidence of Complications.

Janak Bechar, Thomas Kidd, Howard Chu, Joseph Hardwicke

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Janak BecharPlastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, GBR.
Thomas KiddPlastic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, GBR.
Howard ChuPlastic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Joseph HardwickePlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reporting of complications such as infection, necrosis, oil cysts and haematoma after fat transfer varies widely in the literature. Numerous variations in techniques (for example, cannula size, infiltration solution and fat-processing methods) have been described across a heterogeneous patient population for age, fat harvest location and recipient site. To date, no comprehensive review of the literature has been performed for all fat transfer procedures across the body. This study aims to provide novel information on the incidence of complications after fat transfer and is unique in its size and scope. A systematic review of English literature was performed from 01/01/08 to 01/09/24 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PUBMED and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Measured complication outcomes included necrosis, infection, induration, oil cysts, haematoma and pneumothorax. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the pooled complication incidence from selected articles. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, 42 articles progressed to final analysis with a total of 6268 patients. Major complications investigated were fat necrosis (n=44, 0.7%), infection (n=66, 1%), induration and calcification (n=40, 0.6%), oil cysts (n=7, 0.1%) and haematoma (n=4, 0.06%). Pneumothorax post-procedure incidence was 0.1% (n=6). Overall complication incidence was 4.2%. This study is unique in its scope and size and can be used for counselling patients in the pre-operative setting, providing a benchmark for surgeons to assess their practice with an overall complication incidence of 4.2%.

Indexed as

autologous fat transferfacial reconstructionfat emulsionfat graft survivalfat survival

Identifiers

PMID41255499
PMCPMC12622863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.