ArticleJournal of clinical practice and research2023
Evaluation of Factors Affecting Outcomes in Arthroscopic Bankart Repair.
Article in Journal of clinical practice and research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to investigate the factors that affect the functional outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. Materials and Methods: We evaluated patients undergoing Bankart lesion repair in this study, which involved a total of 68 patients. For each patient, we identified the number of dislocations, Constant scores, number of sutures, and arthroscopic classification (Type 1 to 5). Results: The postoperative Constant scores of patients with more than one preoperative dislocation were statistically lower than those of patients with only one dislocation (p=0.043). The ABC Type 1 group exhibited significantly better postoperative scores compared to patients in the Type 2 and Type 3 groups (p=0.001; p=0.006). The postoperative Constant scores of patients with ≥3 anchor sutures were determined to be statistically higher than those with <3 sutures (p=0.001). All recurrence cases involved young males with inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) tears, and three out of four recurrences were observed in patients with more than one preoperative dislocation. Conclusion: Constant scores improved in all groups compared to the preoperative evaluation. Better functional outcomes were observed in patients with ABC Type 1, patients with only one dislocation, and patients who underwent labral repair with three or more anchor sutures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.