ArticleAfrican journal of thoracic and critical care medicine2025
Pulmonary rehabilitation across Africa: A continental evaluation of healthcare providers' awareness, availability and utilisation, and barriers to access.
Article in African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Africa, with a high burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), access to medication and availability and use of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) intervention, including awareness of its effectiveness, remain limited. Objectives: To evaluate the extent of clinical awareness and knowledge of and support for PR among healthcare providers, and to identify barriers to PR in Africa. Methods: A comprehensive electronic survey was conducted to assess healthcare providers (HCPs)' beliefs about, knowledge, awareness and utilisation of, and access to PR in Africa, to inform strategies and policies for improved COPD prevention. The survey was adapted and validated for the African context through expert review and pilot testing with regional practitioners. It was then distributed to HCPs in clinical practice through the networks of the South African Thoracic Society and the Pan African Thoracic Society across Africa. Results: Data were received from 108 HCPs representing diverse disciplines across rural and urban locations in 23 African countries (response rate 56%). The median (interquartile range) age was 41.0 (37.0 - 48.5) years, with no significant differences between the locations. Almost all the HCPs (98%) acknowledged the necessity of PR for severe pulmonary disease, and 58% expressed the need to improve their knowledge and skills in this area. Significant barriers such as under-reporting of symptoms by patients (74%) and a lack of easy access to spirometry (53%) were reported, hindering access to and diagnosis and rehabilitation of patients with COPD. Conclusion: The substantial awareness and recognition of PR as an effective intervention for COPD and other chronic lung diseases across Africa is remarkable. It could indicate the feasible benefits that HCPs attach to implementing comprehensive PR in African settings. Equipping all HCPs with the requisite skills to implement an effective, locally acceptable PR programme will mitigate the burden of COPD in Africa. Study synopsis:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.