ArticleOpen veterinary journal2025
Suitability assessment protocol for the release of raptors for rehabilitation: Based on the Delphi method of animal-focused welfare indicators.
Article in Open veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Wild animal rehabilitation enhances individual welfare and supports the long-term viability of wild populations. However, inappropriate practices can negatively impact the ecosystem or result in the animal dying after release. The scientific literature provides extensive documentation of care commonly applied in the rehabilitation of raptors (e.g., absence of injuries or diseases, hunting ability, and flight ability). However, others lack scientific support and have only been mentioned in essays and guides. Aim: This study involved developing a welfare and suitability assessment protocol for the release of raptors from specialized rescue and rehabilitation centres. The protocol evaluates whether birds entering rehabilitation are suitable for release back into the wild. Methods: To identify welfare assessment criteria for raptors, the Delphi method was used with a panel of 24 expert professionals with experience in raptor conservation and rehabilitation. They identified critical welfare indicators for the assessment and incorporation of birds into rehabilitation and release programs, including health, behavior, and injuries. Some indicators were selected, and others were discarded based on their applicability and relevance to a raptor center. Finally, a second survey of the same experts resulted in a theoretical welfare protocol for raptor rehabilitation prior to release. Results: Fifty-five indicators covering health, flight, treatment, feeding, and behaviour were obtained, reviewed, and evaluated by experts. Based on their experience, the experts discarded ten indicators as being either inapplicable or providing unreliable results for release. This resulted in a system of 45 reliable and applicable indicators for deciding whether to release a rehabilitated raptor (body condition, weight, lure feeding pattern, and so on). The first phase provides guidelines for validation in rescue centres to calculate the reliability, repeatability, and reproducibility of the indicators and the instrument as a whole. Conclusion: Rehabilitation is often a lengthy process requiring thorough physical and behavioural assessments. It is irresponsible and detrimental to the animal's welfare to release individuals into the wild who subsequently die of starvation or are unable to adapt to an unfamiliar environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.