ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Fluoride release and recharge from bioactive resins
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bioactive resins can release fluoride ions, but their potential for fluoride recharge is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the fluoride (F) release and recharge capacity of bioactive resins using an Material and Methods: Six specimens were prepared for each group: two bioactive resins (Beautifil Flow Plus and Biocoat), a conventional resin (Opallis Flow), and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Ionoseal). For pH cycling, each specimen was immersed in an acidic solution (Sprite, pH 3.6) for 6 hours at 37 °C, rinsed with distilled water, and then stored in artificial saliva (pH 7.0) for 18 hours. This cycle was repeated for three consecutive days. Afterward, the samples were brushed with fluoride toothpaste and subjected to a second pH cycling phase. For F determination, 1 mL of TISAB was added to each solution, and fluoride levels were measured using an ion-selective electrode. Data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Results: In the initial fluoride release phase, Beautifil resin demonstrated similar performance to Ionoseal and exhibited a significantly higher fluoride release compared to the other materials ( Conclusions: Beautifil resin and Ionoseal exhibited the highest fluoride release in both phases of pH cycling when compared to the other materials. Nevertheless, Ionoseal outperformed the others in fluoride recharge following treatment with fluoridated dentifrice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.